My
Line of Sight
Spending a few Minutes with Our Constitution: Part
three
|
Setting Sail on my new blog page |
First Amendment
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances."
I don’t know if the founding fathers had a crystal
ball in 1791 to investigate what life would be like in 2018, but if they did, I
wonder what they would think about the first amendment now.
On one hand I think they would smile. Just look around and you can find a bountiful supply of religious expressions; Christians of
many varieties, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and many more. Some are ultra
conservative. Some are middle of the road in their beliefs, and others are
progressive believers of the same God as the moderates and conservatives. No
matter what your religious belief, you are free to worship as you please as
stated in the U. S. Constitution.
On the issue of speech, I’m not sure where the
founders would fall.
The one thing about freedom of speech that we
forget to remember, is that, the right for Martin Luther King Jr. to say, “Darkness
cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate;
only love can do that.”
Dr. King’s statement is no
more valid or invalid as the words of David Duke when he said, "Our clear
goal must be the advancement of the white race and separation of the white and
black races. This goal must include freeing of the American media and
government from subservient Jewish interests."
Dr. King’s statement
promotes peace, love and unity, while David Duke’s statement promotes racism,
bigotry and hate. As much as we would love to try to silence the one statement
that goes against our collective beliefs, we can’t, based on the first
amendment to the U.S. Constitution because they are equal under the law. The
only exceptions to this rule is enforced is when that speech incites riots to
the point of violence.
That could be a bitter pill
for us to swallow when we realize that the one that whom promoted peace, love
and understanding as the man whom spews hate and violence, but for democracy to
continue to flourish, we the people must trust the system. If we don’t trust
the system, democracy flounders and ultimately fails.
Before that happens, I
believe there is a possible solution; it’s called conversation. You may say, “I
tried that once and it turned into a shouting match.” Before that happens, I
suggest you try a few simple ideas. The first idea is to pick your battles and
the second is to have an agenda. Let’s consider both plans.
While strategizing your
upcoming meeting, choose just a few topics. If you are the liberal progressive,
like me, and your opponent is far right, conservative, like my neighbor,
remember, your objective is to ask good questions, speak in a thoughtful tone,
not a combative tone and leave enough space between responses. Most of all, do
not convince yourself that your goal is to convert your friend to your cause.
Finally, remember, you are looking for areas of common ground, not more divisiveness.
I mentioned my neighbor and
in 2016 we had just such a conversation.
It was a Saturday morning
and we were enjoying the Saturday morning coffee klatch that takes place in our
retirement community. My neighbor came in and sat at the same table I was at
when we started talking about the upcoming Presidential election. My neighbor,
a friendly guy was not shy about expressing his conservative views and in turn,
I was ready to respond with my thoughts. This back and forth exchange went on
for about thirty minutes, and we found common ground on a few ideas, when
everything went horribly wrong. A third person joined the conversation and she
had no idea what we had discussed prior to her arrival. In thirty seconds she offered
angry and venomous rants which nullified any progress that we may have made.
Based on that experience, I recommend that if more than two people are involved
in the conversation, lay down some ground rules before you begin. Sadly, other
than saying hello to one another in passing, we have not resumed our
conversation, and I would dearly love to do that, because I believe that
conversations done effectively will lead to a better understanding of those
around us and enhances the value of our Constitution.
I am convinced that for
democracy to survive three things must exist; our Constitution exists because
it is a continual work in progress, as life moves far too quickly for us to
keep up with, we must be ready to amend the Constitution as we must move with
the times we live in. America continues to be a melting pot of diverse cultures
and beliefs. These newcomers must be embraced and not left behind in our mutual
growth as a nation. Finally, we must be willing to listen to those whose ideas
differ from ours, as the founding fathers wrote the Constitution based on their
collective experiences living under tyrannical rule before coming to America,
our new citizens bring valued experiences from the past.
The first amendment lays
the groundwork for shaping democracy, and for today, that is my line of
sight.